Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wallets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig's sources address the concerns. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:22, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wallets

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find the significant coverage needed to get this band to the level of notability required by

WP:NBAND Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 13:43, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

I am also nominating the following related releases by the band:

)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails
WP:BAND. As per nom, haven't been able to find anything that asserts notability. --Kudpung (talk) 14:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Fails WP:BAND and
WP:NOTABLE. Tyrol5 [Talk] 15:16, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete -- no notability demonstrated in a
reliable secondary source. N2e (talk) 23:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

As to the several songs, I would delete those pages per AfD nom for the same reason. However, the AfD links on those pages do not link correctly, to the song's AfD pages. They link again to the band's AfD page. Some knowledgeable AfD nominator could probably fix this. N2e (talk) 23:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- It's one AFd for all 4 articles, so its formatted correctly as per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#How_to_list_multiple_related_pages_for_deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 07:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The band released multiple albums on Twin/Tone Records, and received sufficient significiant coverage (SPIN, Star-Tribune, Star-Tribune, Los Angeles Times, San Jose Mercury-News, Reading Eagle, Star-Tribune, Star-Tribune (Minnie Award for 'top underground rock recording'), Star-Tribune, Milwaukee Journal, Star-Tribune, Star-Tribune (Minnesota Music Academy Award nominees - The Wallets nominated for 10 awards), CD Review Digest), passing at least two criteria of WP:BAND.--Michig (talk) 06:19, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Bream, Jon (31 October 1986), "Local groups spin out new discs", Star-Tribune; Toombs, Mikel (1 April 1987), "Wallets cashing in on new LP", The San Diego Union-Tribune; Arnold, Gina (12 April 1987), "The Wallets / Post-Mod Pranksters' Danceable Rhythms / Art-rockers veer from pure performance", The San Francisco Chronicle; Parsons, Jim (18 June 1988), "`Totally Nude' at the Capitol", Star-Tribune; Bream, Jon (4 November 1988), "It's official: Wallets will fold as newest album is released", Star-Tribune; Baenen, Jeff (11 December 1997), "Former bandmates find success in ad world", Associated Press Newswires; Merrill, Ann (24 December 1997), "Marketing // Creative message to workers", Star-Tribune says they were "popular enough to be written up in Newsweek in 1986". "MUSIC in MINNESOTA 100 for 100", Star-Tribune, 22 October 2000 has them in a list of 100 important figures in the past century of Minnesota music-making duffbeerforme (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Music is available on iTunes; videos are available on You Tube Bookworm2828 (talk) 01:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Bookworm2828[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.