Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Schaeffers
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:43, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tim Schaeffers
- Tim Schaeffers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
He has not played a professional senior game at club or international level. Article fails
]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - subject fails WP:GNGdue to the lack of in-depth sources on the web. I am also tagging the following players for similar reasons:
Phil Imray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)Luke Rowe (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)Michael White (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)Tom Biss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lukeno94 (talk) 09:53, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- COMMENT - Tom Biss and Luke Rowe have both played in senior professional games for Wellington Phoenix.Simione001 (talk) 12:03, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rowe and Biss, as they have both played in the A-League, meaning they meetWP:NSPORT.- Delete the rest. They fail ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. 20:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)-gadfium 20:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The article claims he has played two matches for New Zealand A, doesn't that confer notability ? talk) 16:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The New Zealand A is not the same as ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 19:40, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 17:53, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per lukeno94, player has not played in any notable matches. C679 09:44, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (]
- COMMENT - Why has this debate been relisted? There are 3 DELETES.Simione001 (talk) 06:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I believe my comment above is the reason for the three relists, but as GiantSnowman stated, he has not been capped for talk) 15:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as mentioned ample times already, the subject fails notability guidelines due to not playing at a notable level. C679 19:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.