Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Dougherty

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. But please keep the commentary on editors to a minimum, if at all. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Dougherty

Timothy Dougherty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Rusf10 (talk) 03:39, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Keep I would say that the references meet the GNG requirement. --RAN (talk) 04:02, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The nominator is a non-contributor (the past 500 of the editor's 2,000 total edits are 99.9% deletion-related) who is utterly clueless about policy and has apparently never bothered to read or observe the requirements of
    WP:BEFORE. The sources here support the claim of notability. Any claims that this article is promotional should be addressed through editing, not deletion; AfD is NOT cleanup. Alansohn (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Yet another personal attack from Alan Sohn, what a surprise! What is the claim of notability here? That this guy is a mayor of a town of less than 20,000 people? Is it that he is an advocate for traffic safety? Or is it that has a wife and a kid? Am I missing something?--
Rusf10 (talk) 06:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.