Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tour Sampler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tour Sampler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, limited-release comp. As argued before, limited-release albums are actually less notable and much harder to substantiate. E.g. Allmusic mentions it, but doesn't even review it. PROD was denied on the basis that someone paid a lot of money for it several years ago. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:47, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per
WP:RS (I couldn't find anything in a Google search except fan sites and listings of the band's works, but no impartial reviews or anything else usable). Richwales (talk · contribs) 04:24, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.