Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyota C Transmission

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Toyota transmissions#C-series. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toyota C Transmission

Toyota C Transmission (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined three times and then rejected at

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Transportation. Theroadislong (talk) 08:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It does not fail WP:PRODUCT whatsoever. 12DionneJ (talk) 16:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPRODUCT states clearly "A product or service is appropriate for its own Wikipedia article when it has received sustained coverage in reliable secondary sources" your articles had none of these. We don't just copy "build specs" from the manufacturers. Theroadislong (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

• Redirect to
  WP:NPRODUCT, not enough coverage by secondary sources. User3749 (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  All additional sources would just be repeating what the primary sources state. It's a build spec, not something that is subjective. It's an objective fact. 12DionneJ (talk) 16:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#C-series: I looked for sources when this was still in draft but was unable to find any secondary sources. S0091 (talk) 15:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC) S0091 (talk) 15:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  All additional sources would just be repeating what the primary sources state. It's a build spec, not something that is subjective. It's an objective fact. 12DionneJ (talk) 16:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• All additional sources would just be repeating what the primary sources state. It's a build spec, not something that is subjective. It's an objective fact.
• So we can have articles about cars, articles about the engines in those cars, but can't have articles about the transmissions in those cars? Make it make sense. This article expands upon existing articles, specifically, “List of Toyota Transmissions.” It follows the same structure as existing articles that are closely related. These “sister” articles have been in use for almost 2 decades with zero issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12DionneJ (talk • contribs) 16:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to
  WP:NPRODUCT. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#C-series: per the above, I don't have much to add except that when I looked for GNG sources yesterday I wasn't able to find any either. Feel free to drop a {{talkback}} if a few of them turn-up. 184.152.68.190 (talk) 21:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect to
  talk) 00:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#C-series since it fails notability guidelines; agreeing with the above. Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 19:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]