Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Humphrey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tracy Humphrey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Utterly non-notable. Fails

WP:JOURNALIST and all other biographical notability guidelines. Sources given are either not independent (the external links section), a single mention (the San Jose Magazine piece), or a blog post. schetm (talk) 03:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with regret. There are enough sources to demonstrate that
WP:BEFORE search finds only non-RS. The best source I have found is a piece in the Reno Gazette-Journal (which was in part obviously plagiarized for the article) but that is actually just a station bio from the station she was working for at the time. No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources from the article or in searches. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Sources demonstrate that she exists, as one would expect, but there isn't really any indepth coverage about her.Jackattack1597 (talk) 10:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.