Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcript fees

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Transcript fees (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of unreferenced data. Acroterion (talk) 11:43, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: A table of
  encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 11:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Not a purpose of an encyclopedia to give this type of information. Even giving a school's fee, or the price of anything, in its own article would probably not be appropriate unless a secondary source had cited it as being a notable feature. Thoughtmonkey (talk) 13:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is
  Original Research. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:45, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 14:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete I don't think I've seen a more blatant case of
  talk) 14:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.