Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Type2error

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Type2error

Type2error (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional page created and majorly contributed to by SPA/COI. Has been toned down and wikified considerably by myself in August (previous version here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Type2error&oldid=668083050 ) however I think it fails notability tests. Rayman60 (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 00:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 00:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No convincing signs of solid notability and improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per SwisterTwister UkPaolo/talk 20:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.