Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undercover Angel (film)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Per
WP:SPEEDYKEEP#1. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
]
Undercover Angel (film)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Undercover Angel (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails
WP:BEFORE and found a review from The Dove Foundation. Needs one more review in order to pass NFO, NFSOURCES and NEXIST. I found only newspaper listings on Newspapers.com. The review from Common Sense Media doesn’t count because it’s a review for the 2017 film of the same title. The Film Creator (talk) 18:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 18:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Added the review the nominator mentioned+2 mini reviews (but one is in El País). Keep.
Worst case scenario: redirect to director's filmo but I don't think it's necessary.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC) - Keep: There are also reviews in The Ottawa Citizen and the Los Angeles Times. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 06:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and comment. Since the fall of 2023, The Film Creator has nominated 28 articles for deletion with only 3 closing as delete. That's pretty remarkable. Of the articles that were kept, half were kept speedily. This verges on a situation where The Film Creator should seriously consider if they should refrain from starting more AFDs. From the many film nominations, it can be widely observed that: (a) Rotten Tomatoes is useless in many cases. (b) The Film Creator is unable to find reviews that other users have little problems finding. Why is that? (c) The Film Creator should learn from these users, and maybe even contact them directly instead of wasting everyone's time with ill-conceived nominations. (d) Sure, the articles are improved through this process, but AFD is not cleanup. Geschichte (talk) 12:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per added sources. Toughpigs (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw this nomination. Apparently, I need to practice WP:BEFORE more carefully. I vow not to nominate any film articles for the rest of 2024. The Film Creator (talk) 02:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.