Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unifoam Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unifoam Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:CORPDEPTH. I search the name "Unifoam Group" and just "Unifoam" and failed to find in-depth sources for either search. CNMall41 (talk) 19:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing could be found about the subject for it to meet CORPDEPTH or GNG —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 20:37, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
keep I created this page The Group was found in 1982 and has 3 factories around Nigeria, some resources gathered are in the references. Amin Dayekh (talk) 10:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amin Dayekh (talk • contribs) 10:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails
WP:GNG - no significant coverage - all the info in the article is just passing mentions. No indication of why the company is notable. Being a successful player in an important category suggests there should be more profiles or other coverage. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:26, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.