Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union of Catholic Asian News

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Union of Catholic Asian News

Union of Catholic Asian News (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think it is a non notable news portal. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 03:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 03:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 03:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Goldsztajn (talk) 22:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Goldsztajn (talk) 22:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep No evidence of BEFORE. AfD is not cleanup. Passes ORG.^[1][2][3]

--Goldsztajn (talk) 22:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep passes
  WP:GNG per above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: Per
  WP:GNG. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep as per the reliable sources identified above which show a close pass of
  WP:GNG so that deletion is no longer necessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• keep – passes
  WP:GNG per above. - MA Javadi (talk) 22:21, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep – Per Goldsztajn. Notable but it's a stub. Needs more inline citations.—Allenjambalaya (talk) 07:35, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.