Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unlimited Class Wrestling Federation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unlimited Class Wrestling Federation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage. Non-notable fictional wrestling federation. SL93 (talk) 01:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:42, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it serves no guarantee to be kept here since I highly doubt it would pass
WP:GNG. I tried to find information outside of here, there probably would be no information on the subject. --Vaco98 (talk) 03:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. This article about a fictional entity is presented almost entirely from an in-universe perspective, contrary to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. Only the first sentence and part of the infobox contain any real-world perspective. Every source cited is a comic book, except for CBR - the World's Top Destination for Comic, Movie & TV news which is a broken link, and UCWF at MarvelDirectory.com which is a "404 Not Found" link. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd note that

MOS:REALWORLD applies mostly to writing style and is not, in itself something that can be used as a deletion criteria. Artw (talk) 04:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. Marvelcruft. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:45, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article doesn't establish notability.
Avilich (talk) 22:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Longstanding fixture of the Marvel universe that has spanned across multiple prominent storylines, particularly in Mark Gruenwald's Capatin America run, and elements of which have been touched on by the MCU (in particular the The Falcon and the Winter Soldier series). Would agree the in universe cites could do with bolstering/swapping out with cites from other sources, which I have made a start on. Artw (talk) 03:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article after the minor changes described above is still effectively the same: some of the refs have been replaced, with no actual change in the actual or potential content that complies with
Avilich (talk) 04:03, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Eh, that sounds a bit like sour grapes to me. At any rate the argument that the UCWF isn't covered anywhere outside of the comics, which is a big part of the deletion rationale, is pretty busted. Artw (talk) 04:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you get that idea? I said there is "no significant coverage" and not "there is no coverage anywhere outside of the comics". SL93 (talk) 04:38, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.