Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uno (ThisGirl album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Continued merge discussion on the article's talk page would be encouraged. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uno (ThisGirl album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 19:37, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (and improve) - see my comment here. The articles for this group need some work and a few sources can be dug up with a little effort. Give it a little time and I'll see what improvements I can make. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update I have made several additions to the article, which hopefully will help with the notability question. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I suppose the wager was that no one would read the sources cited: "Whatever this band are on, I don't think I want any" (MusicOMH), "catastrophic lack of imagination makes for a joyless listen" (Gigwise). A lukewarm review from a self-published fanzine (Vault), one fan who bewails the injustice that
thisGIRL was still only playing pubs in 2005 (Sputnik Music), and a bland pre-release announcement by the band's label (Drowned in Sound) round out the citations in the article. This last primary source was added by user:Doomsdayer520, "hopefully [to] help with the notability question," so it seems doubtful he can produce better sources with which to improve the article. Still it's a very funny article, a backhanded compliment to a favorite pub band. Yappy2bhere (talk) 16:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:CIVIL. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 01:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Indeed I did assume good faith. I assumed that you did your best to find reliable sources, that you added the best you found to the article, but the best source available was the pre-release announcement by the record label. That's why I don't believe that this article can be improved. Yappy2bhere (talk) 02:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep/Merge to the band's discography. If it can be expanded, all well and good. If not, the tracklisting can be incorporated into the band's discography.--Michig (talk) 09:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.