Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uttar Pradesh train accidents

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to add much value over Category:Railway accidents in Uttar Pradesh. Vectro (talk) 20:51, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per
  WP:NOTDUP: "It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic."--Prisencolin (talk) 06:41, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Sure. Just that this particular article in particular isn't adding much vs a category. Vectro (talk) 02:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Upmerge to
  List of Indian rail accidents. No need for a specific page on one state. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Keep. Hey, this isn't comparable to, say, a "List of train wrecks in Rhode Island". Uttar Pradesh is bigger than, well, ANY OTHER SUBDIVISION OF ANY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD, apparently. And it probably depends far more on train travel and freight than do countries of its size (such as the United States, it is almost as big population-wise as the United States!). Compare this one's 9 collisions and derailments since 2010 to what's in List of rail accidents in New Zealand. That covers, in more detail for each one, 11 incidents since year 2000, but including "10 July 2010, Wellington – Morning passenger services suspended after two trains bring down overhead lines." No disrespecting the importance of a delay of commuters in a country of 4.5 million, but I suspect the number of person-years lost in train delays in U.P. each year are greater than all the person-years awake or asleep in Wellington, yet the U.P. doesn't list mere delays yet. And no disrespecting the 10.5 million pop. corresponding to List of Czech rail accidents, with its 2 accidents listed that killed 4 since 2010, but incidents like 69 killed in U.P. seem more important. How about merging those others into List of rail accidents in the southern hemisphere and List of rail accidents in Europe respectively? :( It is entirely reasonable to have a separate list for each and every Indian state, methinks; the India-wide list covers accidents of faint interest to persons living "hundreds of millions of persons away" (using an odd distance-measure, but my point is U.P. readers probably like a more relevant "local" list. This list has different info than the India-wide list, but I think it would even be fine to have different cuts of exactly the same info. --doncram 03:36, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Qualifies for an article per
  WP:NOTDUP relative to Category:Railway accidents in Uttar Pradesh. The article would benefit from more sources to verify content that is not covered by the category. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.