Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V (Jonas Brothers album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jonas Brothers. This can always be resurrected if it does come to fruition, in any form Black Kite (talk) 09:48, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

V (Jonas Brothers album)

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The band has broken up, so it is unlikely for this album to be released anytime soon. It fails

WP:TOOSOON anyway. Koala15 (talk) 23:50, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:33, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:33, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: They just confirmed on Good Morning America that they are not going to release the album, so this does not pass
CHRYSTAL on Wikipedia, and that cannot happen.HotHat (talk) 12:26, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep: They did confirm the break up and that they are not going to release the album , but they also said that they're going to release 4 more songs more that are unreleased . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.28.31.225 (talk) 16:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, even when they broken up, if enough references back up the album (even if cancelled), it can be kept.
© Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 17:47, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment This album is clearly not notable unreleased it fails
WP:TOOSOON just to name a few. Koala15 (talk) 04:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment.
WP:NALBUMS notes: "In a few special cases, an unreleased album may qualify for an article if there is sufficient verifiable and properly referenced information about it". I'm not convinced this album fits into the "very small number"/Chinese Democracy standard, but I don't see a problem with incorporating some of the key points from the article's "Background" section into Jonas Brothers#2012–2013: V and break-up. Gong show 22:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep' or Redirect. The article itself needs a major overhaul, due to lazy editing. Plus, JoBros announced their decision to release a four song EP to their fans of songs from the album. So it should be made into that EP, once a title is announced (if not already). livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 01:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Seems like enough reliable sources present to keep the article. And if being unreleased alone was enough for deletion, we really wouldn't have a need for
WP:OTHERSTUFF, but...). Erpert ^{WHAT DO YOU WANT???} 01:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect to band article. As Gongshow says, this isn't Chinese Democracy level, but readers may be searching for it, and preservation of the page history will allow any interested editors to merge content into the main article. --BDD (talk) 21:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.