Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vendasta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vendasta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is some notability, but in current form it's highly promotion and overloaded with PR references. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 16:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to remove the PR references but I don't see where it is highly promotion. Barbarabcarneiro (talk) 17:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the current version and references are promotional to the point of
π, ν) 01:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.