Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Orsatti

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 09:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Orsatti

Victor Orsatti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability issues were raised in 2011, but never followed up on. Does not appear notable to me in either film-production or athletic aspect. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 17:26, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a replacement for MySpace. (Anyone still use that?)--Paul McDonald (talk) 23:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Striking my own comments I think I may have looked at the wrong article when I wrote the comment above. I will recuse myself from this discussion.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It seems like he should pass GNG, especially if the "USC quarterback" claim is true, but I don't have the time to research 1920s USC articles. - Bbny-wiki-editor (talk) 18:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Even if true, that's not sufficient to satisfy
      WP:NCOLLATH. It didn't say that he was the starting quarterback, and even if he was, I am still not sure that that would be sufficient. --Nlu (talk) 19:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
      ]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 19:05, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tarc, fundamentally your threshold for notability is higher than mine, we know that from years of AfDs together, but that one cite was just illustrative.--Milowenthasspoken 14:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Of course different people have different "thresholds" for notability. Please refrain from such personal comments. They have no bearing on the issue at hand.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Its not unrelated, its the reality of cases near the margins. Both Tarc and I as paragons of civility, you have nothing to fear.--Milowenthasspoken 13:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per Cbl62. Clearly notable looking in google books... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Good sources now found. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the considerable improvement to the article and sourcing by Cbl62. Good work. --MelanieN (talk) 23:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.