Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vid Belec

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 February 1.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.

talk) 00:20, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Vid Belec

WP:ATHLETE. Angelo (talk) 22:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the
my talk 10:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete fails
WP:N. Giant Snowman 08:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete No evidence he is notable yet. If he plays a single second for Inter in a competitive match, he'll pass ATHLETE. Or if sufficient RS mention him, he can pass N or BIO. Currently neither. --Dweller (talk) 12:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, he played in the
Football League Trophy. Lunacy!--Vintagekits (talk) 12:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

He played in a non competitive game. Some notable teams allow fans to play in non-competitive games. Does that make the fan notable? And please, it would be very nice if you could contribute strongly at AfD without being offensive. I can cope with being accused of "lunacy", but it does sour the atmosphere. --Dweller (talk) 12:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Redknapp famously brought on a fan in a friendly game who was giving him banter from the stands; is he notable? Giant Snowman 16:53, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seriously comparing Belec to a fan? The
Football League Trophy
.

Well, in 2005 a reality show winner from an

Trofeo Birra Moretti in a game against Juventus... --Angelo (talk) 20:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete fails
WP:N. Friendly does not count. Matthew_hk t c 13:01, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete fails
WP:ATHLETE, has not played in a competitive football match. --Jimbo^[online] 22:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment, define competitive.--Vintagekits (talk) 22:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non exhibition. --Jimbo^[online] 22:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Read the first line of the link you provide. "s a sporting event in which there is no competitive value of any significant kind to any competitor (such as tournament or season rankings, or prize money) regardless of the outcome of the competition." - this was a competition.--Vintagekits (talk) 22:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is funny because you said in Talk:Vid Belec that the whole article should not be considered at all due to its lack of sources, and now you're mentioning it... Anyways, no, there is no competitive value: games like these do not affect any ranking (no league tables or something comparable to it), and do not provide any prize from one of the football confederations (FIFA, UEFA...) or national, or even subnational, entity (The FA, Italian Football Federation...). --Angelo (talk) 22:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was a league, there was a trophy, it is therefore competative. In my book playing two games in this is more notable than playing 1 minutes as a substitute in the

actually notability.--Vintagekits (talk) 09:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Sorry, I thought you were arguing he passes WP:ATHLETE. If you're now arguing he passes WP:N, per your link, it's much easier and we don't need to bother discussing this line of argument about competitive matches. Please just show 2 reliable sources that include more than a trivial mention of Vid Belec and I'll switch to "Strong Keep" straight away, in line with WP:N. --Dweller (talk) 13:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One can never tell what Vintagekits is arguing; he views ATHLETE and N as interchangeable! Giant Snowman 13:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if everyone who plays in a friendly tournament gets a page then we're all doomed Spiderone (talk) 16:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...doomed to what? To an encyclopedia that contains

Phil Bridger (talk) 22:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep multiple sources denoting notability, played in a high profile game Eldumpo (talk) 19:09, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, recreate when he actually plays a professional competitive match. That hurdle should apply with only very rare exceptions (eg Freddy Adu before he played for DC United). Jmorrison230582 (talk) 19:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.