Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Views of Elon Musk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Views of Elon Musk

Views of Elon Musk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this article along with the following articles:

• Philanthropy of Elon Musk
• List of awards and honors received by Elon Musk

This is because I believe they are unnessecary

Note: This discussion has been included in the

ping}} me in replies) 12:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

ping}} me in replies) 12:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

ping}} me in replies) 12:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

ping}} me in replies) 12:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 13:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 13:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I split these articles from
  List of awards received by Charles, Prince of Wales, List of awards received by Lata Mangeshkar, etc. / Philanthropy of Michael Jackson etc. Elon Musk is a level-5 vital article and it makes sense to have subarticles. However, I should emphasize that I would rather delete than merge. Here, merging is the worst of both worlds. The article already summarizes these articles and the level of detail in those subarticles is just not suitable for a biographical article. ~ HAL333 16:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Per HAL333 and my comments at Talk:Elon Musk#Merger proposal. GrammarDamner how are things? 17:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge the
  Philanthropy of Elon Musk article. That section is way too short to have ever been considered for a split in the first place. The main Elon Musk article is only 30kb of prose so I'm baffled why it needed to be split so much at all. The views article is more justifiable so weak keep on that one. HAL's "agressive summary style" was very aggressive, and the articles for Einstein,, Charles, etc. are substantially longer than this one. Just because it "makes sense to have subarticles" doesn't mean there should be several short subarticles, with a not-so-long main article left behind. Reywas92^Talk 20:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Unless there is some guideline that states its an unnecessary fork other than the nominators feelings, then keep as there are plenty of citations for notability of Top 2 richest man in the world. Expertwikiguy (talk) 02:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• This isn't a question of whether there are enough sources or not. Please read the background information linked above. Kind regards,
  ping}} me in replies) 11:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Keep and leave to normal editing and discussion to resolve. Forks and
  WP:ATD. postdlf (talk) 14:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.