Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikidia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete.

WP:REFUND applies. MBisanz ^talk 12:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Vikidia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet

WP:WEBCRIT, as per source searches. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 05:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - Gave it a pretty good search. It seems like a great idea for a site, but I haven't found enough to satisfy
OLPC with this article. I did an exhaustive search of GNews and went through many pages of ghits unfiltered by language and this is about all I came up with. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:09, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.