Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wake Me Up Music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 10:18, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wake Me Up Music

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Xouldn't establish that this is a

WP:NOTABLE company. Boleyn (talk) 10:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - A search revealed mostly music videos for a song called "Wake Up", but narrowing it down gave me this. It's either a blog or a news report, but it's at the moment the only reliable coverage I can find (the rest were actual, non-reliable blogs). Since Singapore's primary language is English, since most of their bands aren't notable enough for their own article, and since I couldn't find more sources, it pains me to say that the label hasn't been covered enough in reliable sources. It is interesting to note however, that to my knowledge, coverage for indie music is usually difficult to find because of their nature, so that could be a factor to the lack of sources, and not because the label itself is not "prominent" enough. If someone else finds sources I've missed, feel free to leave a message on my talk page.
csdnew 01:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - lack of sources. This wouldn't necessarily cause me to call for deletion, as there are many record labels which I consider inherently notable for which sources are very difficult to find as Narutolovehinata5 points out. However, seven releases, with only one EP release by a notable band, does not seem notable. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 13:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, typically artist managers and the like aren't considered notable except at the very pinnacle of the field (think
WP:CORP either. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:21, 30 December 2013 (UTC).[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.