Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walloon SME finance and guarantee company
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Walloon SME finance and guarantee company
- Walloon SME finance and guarantee company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:ORG. declined prod. hardly anything in gnews for its French name [1]. LibStar (talk) 03:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. ]
- Week keep. There are some mentions of the organization in printed sources: one in English - Jonathan Potter (1 January 2003). Private Finance and Economic Development: City and Regional Investment. OECD Publishing. pp. 109–. ISBN 978-92-64-10199-9. Retrieved 27 August 2013., more in French - just search Google Books for "Sowalfin". Given that there is something like 20 French mentions, I am going to say this org is probably notable - unless someone can shown me how I am wrong (if so ping me and I'll look at the arguments here). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Gbooks sources (easily verifiable) as indicated by Phil Bridger and Piotrus. --cyclopiaspeak! 18:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.