Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Websites blocked in India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There seems to be a consensus not to *delete* this information, and people want it kept in some form. Between the idea of merging and integrating with Internet censorship in India however there is less agreement. Defaulting to a keep, with any merge discussions to take place on the talk page or other venues to seek more consensus. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 08:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Websites blocked in India

Websites blocked in India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article already covered in

And I merged the important content to

Capitals00 (talk) 09:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 08:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 08:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and Split Internet censorship in India. The latter is a rather large article and covers the topic in much more detail. The section Blocked Websites could be removed as its redundant. Rather, a short summarry with a link to this article will be more useful and easy to understand. Yashovardhan (talk) 10:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Merger will not be an appropriate solution as merging with
  Websites blocked in mainland China and so on... — Sanskari ^Hangout 16:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to
  WP:CFORK applies.  Sandstein  09:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge per
  WP:FORK and as suggested by Sandstein. Bearian (talk) 14:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did someone even read the (sometimes erratic and/or nonsense, regularly badly sourced) "wisdom" on said page?--*thing goes (talk) 21:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and Split Internet censorship in India, as above. Deathlibrarian (talk) 09:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep although I'm not sure if it's realistic to include a list of blocked websites - surely that list could change all the time, without warning, and Wikipedia isn't a directory. The rest of the content is fine - the list, however, needs a rethink. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.