Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weekly Re-Viu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to ViuTVsix. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:27, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Re-Viu

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign of

notability. All three references have no mention of "Weekly Re-Viu". Wcam (talk) 16:45, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to ViuTVsix, the channel that airs the show. menaechmi (talk) 18:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to ViuTVsix. No independent notability. Coverage by other news sources don't even seem to mention this programme by name even though they do talk about Reuters' involvement in producing the show. The relevant discussion on zh.wp has resulted in the same outcome for the same reason. Deryck C. 10:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.