Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilbur Soot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wilbur Soot

Wilbur Soot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for subject of article who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Couldn't find anything besides the usual junk like Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Twitch, Soundcloud, Spotify, Pinterest and many other social media pages and databases/Wikipedia mirrors, as well as casual mentions/name checks and gossip crap. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 09:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The subject is not sufficiently notable for inclusion. The article also reads like it was copied from Fandom, likely because it was in fact copied from there. I have added an attribution template for now. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:02, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There's nothing about this artiste that would meet the criteria at
  WP:MUSICBIO. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - A do-it-yourself guy who is very good at self-promotion at the usual streaming and social sites, but this WP article is clearly an attempt to
  reliable media coverage. ––DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. I've seen some dreadful "citations" in my time but the front page of a subreddit is new on me! Agree with all of above. Wodgester (talk) 15:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Only social media type sources not the secondary sources are needed Spudlace (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non notable. peterl (talk) 21:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.