Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windatareflector
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 19:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Windatareflector
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Windatareflector (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only sources cited on this article are the developer's web site, a couple unreliable blogs, and a couple indiscriminate software download directories. I've looked and I could only find more of the same. I believe this does not meet either
MrOllie (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the MrOllie (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)]
- Delete - per nom, fails WP:GNG. I tried looking for sources as well, but couldn't find anything that would make this notable. Clovermoss (talk) 17:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.