Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Withlocals

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nom and a consensus to keep - no need to prolong.

(non-admin closure) Britishfinance (talk) 23:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Withlocals

Withlocals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company ad-like entry, most of references are blogs, press releases and primary. A few mentions in passing. Some usual startup trivial coverage related to fundraising. There is a piece about it in

WP:BEFORE doesn't show anything else that's good) we can find reasons to not delete this... right now IMHO it falls on the wrong end of boderline, but with the AFR piece it at least shows a possibility of not being your garden variety spam (plus, the creator is an experienced Wikipedian I respect :D and not some COI SPI, so AGF on the intent, too). Further thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (Note, I'm article's author).
I have gone through google-scholar today and added 6 academic references to the lead paragraph (tightening that section up in the process). I acknowledge that these academic articles only refer to Withlocals in order to illustrate their wider points but I believe they collectively help demonstrate that the organisation is sufficiently notable to be seen as representative of trends about the 'sharing economy' and 'gastronomic tourism' - particularly in southeast asia, the market where the company focused initially. I would also argue that the "horizon 2020" - from the European Commission grant makes it notable on the basis that they've won a government-funded support 'prize'.
As a side point, given that you took the time to check the edit history you will have noticed that the article had been being expanded daily - I hadn't abandoned it. I'd have appreciated if you would have brought your concerns about the notability of the article to me directly (e.g. pinging me on its talkpage) rather than going straight for the deletion nomination which starts a ticking-clock. Late last week I also asked the organisation itself if they had any other press-clippings they had collected, and if they could provide some free-licensed multimedia, to supplement the article - so that might come in soon too. As you state yourself Piotrus, you know and trust me so you're not claiming this is drive-by spam: my motivation for creating the article is that I recently signed-up to be a local guide on this platform in my home city, and was doing research about it in the process. Wittylama 10:58, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was probably a bit too hasty. The odds are good that this will be kept, but I'd appreciate a third party looking at this before I consider withdrawing my vote. AfD, in the end, are the only place we can count on attracting more editors to comment on such issues. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:25, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:02, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There seems to be enough independent coverage to meet
    WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 16:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Thanks for finding those references Cunard. I've added them in. Wittylama 12:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for adding the sources, Wittylama. Thank you for withdrawing the AfD, Piotrus. Cunard (talk) 09:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.