Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's International Resource Exchange (WIRE)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women's International Resource Exchange (WIRE)

Women's International Resource Exchange (WIRE) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obscure NN "service," fails the GNG and

WP:ORG. All sources are either primary or namedrops, with no real information other than that this service once existed. No substantive coverage of the subject found. Article created by an editor with quite a few such articles (mostly on ephemeral periodicals) lacking sourcing or notability, several of which already have been forcibly removed to draftspace, deleted or are at AfD/prod. Ravenswing 21:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per OP. Insufficient sourcing in article to pass the GNG. My BEFORE (Google News, Google Books, newspapers.com, JSTOR) fails to find any references which would redeem it. Chetsford (talk) 15:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I did the exact same thing as Chetsford (also paid subscriber of newspapers.com) and had no luck. I know the subject is mentioned in a few finding aids, but, only as items in collections, so to say, not the actual finding aid subject. Usually a subject like this - if notable - has coverage someplace, somewhere, but, not even in feminism blogs or LGBTQI blogs, which can often be a gateway to sources. But, no luck. Missvain (talk) 16:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subject fails to meet GNG.
    talk) 07:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.