Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Heavyweight Championship (Los Angeles version)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

World Heavyweight Championship (Los Angeles version)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These two articles are completely contextless lists without any introduction or reason why a 'world heavyweight championship' for wrestling in the WWII era was limited to a random city and state and why winning them was a major part of someone's career (Maryland seems completely random); I understand wrestling territories at their barest concept, but otherwise this is just a list that throws us into a list of people and explanation for their win that has zero context and paper-thin sourcing; on top of that @

WP:COPYVIO from what seems to be an equally vague fanpage

which seems to read as some kind of fanfiction rather than a historical record. If someone could improve this article I would definitely pull the nomination, but at this point without context, this is just a name list for championships only the most wrestling-obsessed would recognize.

Also bundled into this nom is;

chatter) 19:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk • mail) 04:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk • mail) 04:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk • mail) 04:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. NiciVampireHeart 01:19, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 17:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails
WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete for failing notability criteria. That is my honest, non-cheating, non-theatrical, non-promotional opinion. -The Gnome (talk) 09:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete oif the article could offer some context, it might be different, but it's simply a list of champions for an old belt. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.