Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World International School

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to ISF Waterloo. Randykitty (talk) 14:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

World International School

World International School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Educated to the age of 18 (or 16) and was therefore a secondary school. The article appears to have been altered by editors connected to ISF Waterloo which replaced it, who seem to be attempting to remove all traces of its existence. It is unclear whether this school is a direct successor to the WIS or just occupies the same site. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Necrothesp and per long-standing precedent stated at
    WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. –Davey2010Talk 23:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Merge (changed from delete, see below)
    WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES says "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions and high schools are being kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists.". That's here the case. There are zero refs in the article and there are zero sources in web searches. It might be some predecessor organization of the ISF Waterloo, or just a mistaken name for the same institution, or a hoax. Without sources, we can't know. Kraxler (talk) 17:30, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The source clarifies that it is the same campus, just a different name after a merger. Thus the history of the older school should be merged, and the name redirected, to ISF Waterloo. Kraxler (talk) 18:30, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 06:44, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.