Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XOYO

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

XOYO

XOYO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find anything that suggests any notability, there are a couple of media articles, however a good PR firm can easily facilitate this. The article was created by a SPA. Devokewater@ 09:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Devokewater@ 09:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Devokewater@ 09:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Devokewater@ 09:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A small night club that doesn't have any news coverage from reliable sources does not meet GNG. The Resident Advisor articles are nothing more than announcement posts that read like press releases. One of the the promotional Resident Advisor articles even has a link to purchase tickets. The Chinese carry out across the street from my apartment has more news coverage than this small club. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonstephen0 (talkcontribs) 20:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.