Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xennial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:51, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Xennial

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Usage appears to sparse to meet

WP:NEO. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:01, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm the author. I just noticed that "Generation Catalano" already exists which Xennial is another term for. Should these instead be combined?CrescentHawk (talk) 17:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I vote for the article to be deleted. The terms "Generation Catalano" and "Xennial" are not commonly used; the same can be said for Generation Jones. "Xennial" is not a term that is quoted from a highly reputable source such as a major newspaper or magazine, and it hasn't caught on with the general public. CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 23:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are using Generation Jones as a precedent , its been an established entry for over a decade here. Moreover, the concept of the sub generation group in question was also noted by Slate, a subsidiary of the Washington Post. (I'm more interested in the concept than the term used, hence a vote for *Merge CrescentHawk (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just add that the term was referenced by the Huffington Post as of today as well. CrescentHawk (talk) 16:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:27, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with
Xennial can be integrated there. — Bilorv_(talk)^(c)(e) 17:50, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - non-notable and barely used
Generation Catalano, no need to merge anything. Kraxler (talk) 17:20, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete as it is not notable. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 19:13, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Basically just a made-up word, not notable, fails
WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.