Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogi Bizerk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yogi Bizerk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing

WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by User:Andrew Davidson with the usual copy-paste edit summary that did not challenge the PROD rationale. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Extremely minor character that, as far as I can tell, appeared in a single comic book issue. There is virtually real coverage of the character in reliable sources - even the The Superhero Book being used in the article as a source basically just name-drops him with no actual information, as seen here. Rorshacma (talk) 15:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:34, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails
WP:GNG, not adverse to a redirect if a suitable target can be found. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. From my search, a one-off character that doesn't even have a DC Wikia page. Appears in one story of one comic and dies. A potential redirect could go to Creeper (DC Comics), but I don't really see why anyone would be looking this character up. But I don't get the PROD complaining -- they are allowed to be removed for any reason (minus socking), no one owes you a policy explanation. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 01:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.