Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZCubes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

WP:SOFTDELETE given the lack of non-sock input despite two relists. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

ZCubes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete and Salt given the sheer blatancy of this being used only for advertising in the time it has existed, also we honestly know that the 2008 AfD had several troubles in that, not only were there SPA accounts taken seriously for Keeping but no one actually cared to acknowledge the concerns, thus here we are. All sources listed are simply press releases (or republishing of them) or trivial and unconvincing information sources, none of which substantiate notability. Given this was deleted 3 times ten years ago, and it's quite honestly only stayed this long because no one ever cared to renominate again, it's conceivable this will be restarted once again if deleted, and it should not be accepted at all unless AfC is used, as to allow re-examining before it ever gets to mainspace. SwisterTwister talk 00:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
Talk to my owner:Online 00:47, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete' per nom, as well as the extensive use of buzzwords. ~~Pyrusca (talk) 04:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

[Revert as per

WP:BLOCKEVASION

using strikethrough font. 05:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 09:22, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:54, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.