Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZipRecruiter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ZipRecruiter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable. Basically promotional. Refs are only about funding. A claim of "1 o f 3 job-focused startups leading the way in 2012" is much too specialized for notability DGG ( talk ) 23:49, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 14:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- typical "startup spam". K.e.coffman (talk) 08:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I concur with the nomination, there's nothing at all here for actual independent notability and it's clear it's only advertising what the company would use for its own website. SwisterTwister talk 20:38, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.