Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zsuzsa Szikra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – bradv🍁 05:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zsuzsa Szikra

Zsuzsa Szikra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet

.
A Google search of her name turns up just 2,340 hits.
The text of the article appears to be copied directly from the artist's (self-penned?) bio at a site called "Picasso Mio" ( https://www.picassomio.com/zsuzsa-szikra.html )
The article is rife with weasel words such as claiming that her "...works are marked by their poetic abstract character" (whatever that might be), and utterly pointless claims like "During her childhood Zsuzsa spend her summer holidays with her grandmother on the shores of Lake Balaton in Hungary" and "Zsuzsa and her grandmother made long boat trips on the lake Balaton which made a lasting impression on Zsuzsa..."
The article reads like an advertisement.
The article is full of cruft, such as a list of "study trips" in which the subject visited the Hermitage and other museums.
There are no images of the artist's work.
Four "external links" are listed, three of which either have 404 errors or revert to the homepage, and the fourth has 4 sentences (in Hungarian).
Trying to determine which -- if any -- of the 34 provided reflist links are active, are relevant, or support would be a Herculean task.
I propose that the article be deleted for failing to meet ]

• Comment Discussion page was created without the {{
  WP:AFDHOWTO. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 14:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. There appear to be a number of sources cited in the Dutch and Hungarian versions of this article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can't find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Wrt to the Dutch sources, there isn't much there. If someone has worked as an artist in the Netherlands there's usually something at rkd.nl, and she does have an entry there, https://rkd.nl/nl/explore/artists/314992 but it's empty. Vexations (talk) 16:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment
  WP:GOOGLEHITS is not notability criteria. Trillfendi (talk) 17:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete This is the first time I've seen GHITS of 2,340 used for an argument of non-notability but
  WP:NOTRESUME applies. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.