Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 July 22

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log

July 22

Category:Jethou

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Limited contents and scope for growth. --Xdamrtalk 21:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Jethou (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. OCAT. Small category for a private island that is not likely to be expanded. There is a List of tenants of Jethou which should provide ample navigation and currently provides significantly more information that is not available from a category. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:51, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. While I generally agree- the island is so small as to not really warrant its own category - I have managed to expand the number of articles in the category, so part of the justification above is misleading. Grutness...wha? 01:30, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Misleading only as much as the assumption that this is defining for the individuals who were added. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:49, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Let's keep it, and Vegaswikian will surely keep an eye on it. In the case of a geographic entity, I feel that even a small category has a right to exist. Debresser (talk) 23:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Surely you know I will not watch a category for maintenance purposes. Also if I follow your argument, any settlement with, let's say a building, should have a category. I think that is overkill. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:06, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per nom, and based on the contents the list of tenants serves much of the proposed purpose of the category, drawing together the island's tenants.
    talk) 00:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep This is a well-defined category for a geographic feature within the parent
    WP:CLN's mandate that lists AND categories should work together in synergistic fashion, with absolutely nothing in WP:CLN stating that "the 'category camp' should not delete or dismantle Wikipedia's lists, and the 'list camp' shouldn't tear down Wikipedia's category system—doing so wastes valuable resources. Instead, each should be used to update the other." WP:CLN never states anywhere that a category should be deleted because a list is "better". Alansohn (talk) 19:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Barack Obama presidential controversies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete as empty. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest merging Category:Barack Obama presidential controversies to Category:Obama Administration controversies
Nominator's rationale: Merge. Duplicate categories. Only one of the two needs to exist. The proposed target is the older of the two, but I have no preference on which is kept. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And I've removed that sole category entry. Since nothing in
talk) 02:40, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Remixes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Bimbo Jones remixes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Dave Audé remixes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Friscia & Lamboy remixes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Jack D. Elliot remixes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Jason Nevins remixes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Peter Rauhofer remixes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete - there is no theoretical limit to the number of people who can remix a particular song. The typical CD single includes several mixes by several different producers. Categorizing songs by people who choose to remix it strikes me as overcategorization.
talk) 22:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

I have notified

talk) 14:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People associated with Bedford College

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge/Rename. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:People associated with Bedford College to Category:People associated with Bedford College (London)
Propose renaming Category:Alumni of Bedford College to Category:Alumni of Bedford College (London)
Propose renaming Category:Academics of Bedford College to Category:Academics of Bedford College (London)
Nominator's rationale: Rename all Since these categories were created the institution article has been moved to
Bedford College (London) due to the existence of other Bedford Colleges (including another in the UK). The categories should match this and avoid confusion. Timrollpickering (talk) 20:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

American river shipwrecks

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge/Rename. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest merging and renaming Category:Shipwrecks of the Mississippi and Category:Shipwrecks in the Mississippi River to Category:Shipwrecks of the Mississippi River
Propose renaming: Category:Shipwrecks of the Ohio to Category:Shipwrecks of the Ohio River
Nominator's rationale: New names reflect the full name of each river and are less likely to be confused with potential state-only shipwreck categories. Also, the "of the" styling matches styling of many other shipwrecks categories and avoids the implication that the wrecks remain in place. (A wreck that occurred in one of the rivers but was salvaged is no longer "in the river", for example.) Both Mississippi categories, however, should be merged regardless of the final name decided, because both cover the same topic. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:44, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:XxxHolic characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:XxxHolic characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: The category only has one article. TTN (talk) 19:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:VJs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge/Rename to Category:VJs (media personalities). Vegaswikian (talk) 22:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:VJs to Category:Something
Nominator's rationale:
talk) 17:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Taxes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge per nom. While there were points made about keeping this as is, the significant amount of overlap and the lack of parent categories that were appropriate for the content really support the merge as nominated. If anyone really thinks that we need to leave a redirect, drop a note on my talk page after the bots move the articles and I'll create it. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest merging Category:Taxes to Category:Taxation
Nominator's rationale: Merge. Currently only contains articles that belong in
T/C) 14:08, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jamba!

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Jamba! (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete - discussed once previously under the name
talk) 06:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Joke characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Joke characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete - we deleted a category for fictional characters used for comic relief some time ago but I can't recall its exact name to find the old CFD. The reasons for deleting that apply to this similar category, specifically that fictional characters can serve a wide variety of roles within a given fictional narrative. Deadly serious characters sometimes crack the best jokes or are the butt of humor and one-note comedy characters are used to advance the dramatic narrative. Fictional characters frequently evolve over their history, starting out as "jokes" and later becoming integral to the dramatic story.
talk) 05:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Yes it was. Forgot the hyphen.
    talk) 06:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Video albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename per nom. Very interesting discussion. The nomination points out that there was no standard for these categories. The one proposed did receive support and while there were some questions, nothing that I read was really an objection. So there was consensus for a rename. Having said that, there may well be a need for additional cleanup. If said cleanup affects some of these newly renamed categories, this decision should not be viewed as an impediment to renominating small subsets of these categories for rename as part of a larger consensus scheme. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Video albums by artist
Nominator's rationale: Rename - As Otto4711 points out here and here, the music video categories are a mess. I propose the phrasing "video albums" because it covers two things: collections of music videos and concert broadcasts. It specifically doesn't include individual music videos, and it makes no claim about what format (such as DVDs) these videos appear in. It seems like a good naming format to me, but other possibilities are welcome. (FYI, if this nomination passes, the video albums categories Category:AC/DC video albums, Category:Black Sabbath video albums, Category:Bruce Dickinson video albums, Category:Deep Purple video albums, Category:Faith No More video albums, Category:Foo Fighters video albums, Category:Hilary Duff video albums, Category:Iron Maiden video albums, Category:Katherine Jenkins video albums, Category:Led Zeppelin video albums, Category:Mariah Carey video albums, Category:Mike Oldfield video albums, Category:Alanis Morissette video albums, Category:Snoop Dogg video albums, Category:Joss Stone video albums, Category:Tenacious D video albums, and Category:The Rolling Stones video albums would all stay the same. If we go a different direction, these might change too.)--Mike Selinker (talk) 15:10, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I closed a single nomination for the Ricky Martin video category to join it here. My concern with "video albums" is that I'm uncertain that a concert video constitutes a "video album". We have no
    talk) 04:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Ok. The term "video albums" doesn't make sense to me, but I'm tired at the moment. Take Category:Yanni videos, these are actually live concert films? I'm sure there are more that are concert videos. So where does something like this fit in? ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 23:33, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In my rationale above, I say that concert videos are video albums, in the same way that the audio recordings of the same concerts are called live albums. So concert videos would go in the video albums categories.--Mike Selinker (talk) 04:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would "Video releases" be a better term ? It would cover video compilations, concert videos and Michael Jackson's Thriller video. Cjc13 (talk) 10:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I like that term. Because what if all live concert videos weren't made into albums. And another example is that this one,
Yanni One on One, is a video release, but neither a live concert nor album, more of a documentary, but a release nonetheless. ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 13:28, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
I considered that possibility, but it seemed to me that "video releases" covers individual song videos, which this nomination is trying to prevent.--Mike Selinker (talk) 19:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How does one tell whether a 'live concert video' is or is not an album? The Yanni template lists the concert videos under 'live albums' which I would accept without a second thought (until now).
talk) 11:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
I think that eventually we would give all of these "video albums" (or whatever) categories. That would take a while, though.--Mike Selinker (talk) 02:45, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Video covers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename to Category:Images of video covers. Consensus was to rename. The target was open to discussion. Since the result is a rename, nothing is really lost by selecting among the options. This decision does not prevent someone from renominating if they feel that the chosen target is unacceptable. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Video covers to Category:Video cover images
Nominator's rationale: Rename - current name is ambiguous, as it could refer to music videos for
talk) 02:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Glossary of German terms

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge/Rename. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest merging Category:Glossary of German terms to Category:German words and phrases
Nominator's rationale: Merge. No way a category can be named "glossary". The inthention of the creator was to distinguish German loanwords from German words used in English texts, but still "alien" to English language. - Altenmann >t 00:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.