Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 September 16

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< September 15 September 17 >

September 16

NEW NOMINATIONS

Category:Songs produced by Nicole Scherzinger

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 18:36, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Almost every other category of this nature is named in the convention of "Song recordings produced by" as opposed to "songs produced by" → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 21:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of the Special Forces of the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Since Special Forces is often used to describe all
omite   20:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the
omite   20:26, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Tijuana folklore

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: administrative close: already deleted as an empty category. Good Ol’factory (talk) 18:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Empty. Keizers (talk) 15:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Memorial bridges

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 18:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: That
WP:DEFINING characteristic and there are better ways to categorize things like bridges - by type (e.g. suspension), purpose (e.g. footbridge) and location. A merge to Category:Bridges is unnecessary as all the articles are probably in subcats of that already (those I've checked are all in "Bridges in <state>" categories etc). Note: Before deleting, someone could check whether any of these should be added to the dab pages. Note: Category:Memorial highways (and subcats) has similar issues, but would probably be better considered in a separate CFD. DexDor (talk) 05:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Terms for females

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Purge and upmerge. I believe that the consensus is clear that the category is problematic and needs to go. So I'll leave it to the more informed to do the cleanup. Afterwards, leave a note on my talk page or list for deletion after the cleanup to have the category deleted. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. The title literally implies it is about terms for all female animals. Georgia guy (talk) 00:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I'm the original creator. The new title would be more precise. Apparently, I can't make a similar move for
    Nick Levinson (talk) 16:38, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment This CfD is advertised with a faulty CfD banner sending editors on a wild goose chase. It should be re-listed to get non-professional CfD participants. XOttawahitech (talk) 16:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_September_16&oldid=1138398796"