Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 March 24

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< March 23 March 25 >

March 24

Category:Sad songs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete - jc37 03:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Sad songs is non-defining and shouldn't be considered as a category. Please see similar discussion Melancholy songs Richhoncho (talk) 19:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bangladeshi educational institute

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 12:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Non-standard category not used by any other country that seems to be attracting a bit of a ragbag of articles that are better sorted in other existing categories. Le Deluge (talk) 19:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- Besides inappropriate grammar (not plural), the two articles are adequately categorised as private universities ion Bangladesh. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:17, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Existing sister cats are enough to cover the articles under it.--Lenticel (talk) 02:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Metropolis of Lyon geography stubs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I'm 50:50 whether this should be kept or not, but I felt it needed discussion. It's a stub category that was created out of process by User:Arteronyl to reflect the creation of the Metropolis of Lyon when it was carved out of Rhône département earlier this year. The general rule is that French départements have their own stub types, but MoL has a special status as a territorial collectivity. This means that it's effectively treated as a separate département but for instance it has retained its old département number which it now shares with Rhône (69). It's a real grey area - I can see arguments both ways. At present there's only one article in there. Le Deluge (talk) 18:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - malformed stub type, aparently no permcat (non-stub category which this category would be associated with), no stub tag. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 22:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well that's kind of the point, this is not just about this particular stub category but a deeper question about the whole status of Metropolis of Lyon on Wikipedia. It should have a permcat regardless, as it is a highly significant administrative entity - it's just one that's a few weeks old so noone has got round to it yet. It doesn't have a stub tag because it was created out of process - but that doesn't mean it won't in future, I've invited the stub guys to comment here. Perhaps the closest equivalent would be to imagine if Washington DC was carved out of Maryland today, but kept all the Maryland administration like MD postal addresses, MD number plates and so on. DC would not be a state either technically or in many administrative respects - and it would certainly be less work for Wikipedia to treat it as a subset of Maryland - but I suspect purists would argue that DC deserved its own hierarchy and stub types on Wikipedia.Le Deluge (talk) 10:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The way to go about this is first to create and populate a permcat, and then deal with the stub category. Although I wouldn't stop the user from doing both at the same time, creating a malformed stub category, without a stub tag, and populating it directly without also creating and populating a permcat isn't acceptable. To take your analogy, imagine that DC were actually going to become a fully separate state-level entity over the course of a decade; at which point would it deserve a stub category of its own? Hard to tell. However, a permcat structure would certainly need to precede a stub cat structure. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Permcat now exists... Le Deluge (talk) 20:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Metropolis of Lyon is more or less a département, in the same way Corsica, which is also called a territorial collectivity, is essentially a région. French départements have their own stub types, and so should the Metropolis of Lyon.  Liam987(talk) 13:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Internal combustion piston engines

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:21, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Reciprocating engines is the industry standard for the referencing of Internal Combustion Engines with pistons and more accurately portrays their operation, i.e. the reciprocating motion of a piston. Aron Pye (talk) 15:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The original is correct, the proposed title would have an obvious and serious overlap with steam engines, which isn't what's needed at all. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1600s architecture

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Usual standard. Such as Category:1600s in Ireland. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – the present naming is the usual standard, see eg
    Oculi (talk) 11:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:16th century in music

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator (NAC). DexDor (talk) 10:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Should be named to Years of the 16th century in music, per usual standard. Check Category:Years of the 16th century in Ireland, Category:Years of the 16th century in literature. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – looking at say
    Oculi (talk) 11:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Comment @OccultZone: Can you explain the benefit of this change? Would the more concise and broad "16th century in music" be repurposed for something else? If not, I don't really see any benefit. SFB 18:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Oculi. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Category:16th century in art‎, Category:16th century in sports‎, etc. The literature category cited was only just created and shouldn't count as a precedent for a naming scheme. kennethaw88 • talk 03:28, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but tidy up -- The "years" articles are cluttering this category, especially as a lot of them (before 1550) are redirects to a decade article. There seems to be enough content after 1550 to have decade categories (two already exist). However there is significnat content in the category that is about the century as a whole. The change that is needed to recategorise the years by decade and to delete the redirects. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:21st century in music

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator (NAC). DexDor (talk) 10:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Should be named to Years of the 21st century in music, per usual standard. Check Category:Years of the 21st century in Ireland, Category:Years of the 21st century in literature. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:17th century in music

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator (NAC). DexDor (talk) 10:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Should be named to Years of the 19th century in music, per usual standard. Check Category:Years of the 17th century in Ireland, Category:Years of the 17th century in literature. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:18th century in music

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator (NAC). DexDor (talk) 10:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Should be named to Years of the 18th century in music, per usual standard. Check Category:Years of the 18th century in Ireland, Category:Years of the 18th century in literature. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:19th century in music

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator (NAC). DexDor (talk) 10:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Should be named to Years of the 19th century in music, per usual standard. Check Category:Years of the 19th century in Ireland, Category:Years of the 19th century in literature. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kosovo building and structure stubs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic London 22:34, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category has only 33 stubs, and my best efforts have only found possibly 3 more (the transclusions of {{Kosovo-university-stub}}, not currently in this category). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Gambia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming:

Rationalle: Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite or indefinite article at beginning of name). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_March_24&oldid=1138408935"