Wikipedia:Category redirects that should be kept

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This page contains suggested guidance about keeping soft-redirected pages for categories.

For basic information on this topic, see

WP:CATRED
. This topic is not to be confused with WP:Categorizing redirects.

Alternative treatments of category redirects

Category redirects are usually created and left behind after a category is renamed. This happens whether the category is processed by a bot or a human editor.

There are three possible courses of action concerning these redirects:

  • Delete. Many such redirects are unlikely to be helpful to editors in the future, so they should be deleted. These include:
    • cases where the original name was mis-spelled or poorly chosen
    • redirects from a different capitalisation.
  • Keep where the category redirect might be useful.

Category redirects that might be useful

The following sets out various cases where it is useful to keep category redirects.

  • WP:DASH
    ), such as date ranges.
  • Alternative spellings and
    WP:ENGVAR
    , especially "organisations"/"organizations".
  • Alternative
    WP:DATERANGE
    formats that editors might well try to use.
  • Categories for objects which had other names in the recent past, if there are many items in the category and there is a chance that someone could use a past name.
    E.g. football team players under previous club names. The same applies to players of other sports, and team managers and if there is a potentially large population for the category.
  • Generally, categories where the first part of the new name is different from the old name, because the first part is what counts in the search bar.
  • Generally, names that editors might try to use again, and which will help editors to find the current name, e.g. Roman Catholic → Catholic, Bolton → Metropolitan Borough of Bolton.
    Consider whether the redirect will be helpful for editors using WP:HotCat, which autofills depending on the what has been typed so far.
    So for e.g. Category:People from the Metropolitan Borough of Bolton, editors are going to try "People from Bolton", so keep "People from Bolton (district)" or "People from Bolton (borough)" – but not both, because one of those would be sufficient.
  • Cases where the standard category naming patterns may not be intuitively understood. For example, people from countries where there is no demonym follow the pattern "People from X", including occupations e.g. "Artists from X", but we use "of" rather than "from" for national office-holders, military personnel and nobility. In those cases, leave a redirect at the page name that includes "from".
  • Redirects where there are many incoming links from talk pages/ CFD pages etc, or where such discussions may have continuing importance. In these cases, redirects will help interested editors to trace the precedent discussions.
  • Redirects from category merges where both pages have significant page history, which might be worth keeping for attribution.
  • Redirects from category merges where other-language Wikipedias are still using both categories. In these cases, keeping the redirect may help another editor or a future bot-process to trace and merge categories in the other Wikipedias. Include the rcat template {{Soft redirect with Wikidata item}}.

See also