Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 October 30

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

30 October 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-10-30 Edit

2010-10-30 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bloch (shoes). CSBot reporting at 03:49, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article now deleted db-user but does appear to have been a copy. Shell babelfish 06:36, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. Also false positive. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I'm iffy on this one, but I think it's probably clean enough. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:37, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. OTRS incomplete. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:45, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:52, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. This one did follow quite closely on the original source. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:31, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Green tickY Noted your conclusion at the talk page, but I'll leave it up to the editors to add or not. It's kind of weird from a "reliably sourcing" standpoint to source it to a page that copied it from us..... :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:12, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Confirmed, the ebook reproduced on the source Verno traced has a preface dated 1992 MLauba (Talk) 13:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:12, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MLauba (Talk) 13:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyright concerns remain. Article deleted, left CUP notice. Deleted per precautionary principle: multiple instances of text artifacts point at last 50% of the text copy / pasted from third party sources. Although all sources aren't directly identifiable through web search, there is enough circumstantial evidence to point at significant copy / paste MLauba (Talk) 14:07, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]