Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 March 29

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

29 March 2012

Bot flagged articles

SCV for 2012-03-29 Edit

2012-03-29 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. CharlieDelta (talk) 19:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. CharlieDelta (talk) 20:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I did some re-wording; I think it's all right. — madman 18:10, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
The formulation “Author’s Certificate” was first written into Law of the
USSR
Government ordered the publication of Great Soviet Encyclopedia in 1925. I.A. Gringol'ts did not show the original source in his article “Author’s Certificate” in Great Soviet Encyclopedia, because in that time all properties belong to the Government, it was as the tradition (de-facto) and the Law. I.A. Gringol'ts was not author of the formulation of “Author’s Certificate” and he was not member of Russian Government in 1919.
Resume: Article User:Inventcreat/Author’s Certificate (Variant 1) has not been broken any copyright. User:Inventcreat — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.191.4 (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article has been deleted as it demonstrably copies from the 1979 Great Soviet Encyclopedia - including "form 2." Please write articles in your own words except in keeping with
    Wikipedia:Copy-paste. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I couldn't see the source in full there, but confirmed copying through snippet google searches. I also found content copied from at least two books. Looks like this was a pastiche of copied content. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:18, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. --Dpmuk (talk) 00:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article redirected to a non-infringing target. Deleted and redirected by others. Redirect seems to be to a different person but also seems a valid redirect. --Dpmuk (talk) 00:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 00:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 00:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Yup. Close paraphrasing. Scrubbed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:47, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 00:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]