- )
I don't want to make a big deal about this, but the closer Mbisanz has not made any edits since May 1st when they closed a bunch of discussions, including this one, so my inquiry on the closer's talk page has gone unanswered and has been archived. I don't believe there was consensus to retarget this redirect. It has been getting some sporadic use, so I'd like to see this addressed. Mdewman6 ( talk) 00:13, 3 September 2022 (UTC) [reply- Overturn to no consensus (or, more specifically, "consensus to keep, no consensus to retarget"). The closer correctly realized that there wasn't a consensus to delete, but I don't see a consensus on the secondary issue of whether to retarget: Tavix made a reasonable point, Mdewman6 reasonably countered that point, and no other editor weighed in. When a discussion consists of two editors disagreeing, no consensus is the only possible closure unless one side's arguments are clearly at odds with policy (which wasn't the case here). And since this isn't
one of the cases where no consensus can result in a retarget, the status quo should stand. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 05:35, 3 September 2022 (UTC) [reply
- FWIW (it probably doesn't change the reading of the discussion anyhow, but...), I don't much remember opining on this one – but I think it unlikely I had an opinion as to the exact target, especially given that I don't have an opinion on that currently. Overturn to no consensus, default to status quo, even given that. J947 † edits 06:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Overturn to consensus to keep, no consensus to retarget per Extraordinary Writ. Tavix and Mdewman6 both made reasonable points and nobody else supported or countered either so no consensus is the only option. Thryduulf (talk) 10:16, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Overturn not a good reading of the ivote discussion. Should be no consensus. Lightburst (talk) 01:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- overturn. Non-obvious close with inadequate explanation. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Overturn per Extraordinary Writ. Stifle (talk) 13:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
