Wikipedia:Editor review/2
Appearance
2
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
says you, says me 16:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
]
Reviews
- Hi 2! From what I can see, Your doing a great job with your AFD and CSDing. Your Contribs show that your doing just fineĀ :-). Have you tried to rescue articles from AFD? I think you would do a great job in this. Anyways, Keep up the good work, It would be a shame to find out you have been blocked! - nz26 Talk | Contribs | Email 09:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- You are definitely knowledgeable; you are street wise to what goes around here. However, I notice that you tend to dive into things head on; you're not hesitant to be bold. That's a great quality, but be careful that you don't land yourself into a sticky situation you could have otherwise avoided. It's all right to take it slow at times. Keep it up! bibliomaniac15 The annual review... 02:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using X!'s counter
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- Primarily .
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- There are two that come to mind, both from my early days on the project. The first was good faith, (especially concerning AFD and CSD), take a deep breath and count to ten when you're feeling angered or emotional, and NEVER make hasty or rash judgements.
- There are two that come to mind, both from my early days on the project. The first was
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.