Wikipedia:Editor review/Leo-Roy

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Archiving this request as user did not transclude the request onto the main page and because a considerable amount of time has passed since this request was made. Netalarmtalk 06:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leo-Roy*

Leo-Roy (talk · contribs) I feel the need to be reviewed because I've become more tied to Wikipedia than before and I think that if I could ask others how well I've been recently, it would help a lot for me. I'll have to note that I wasn't really that good of an editor starting here, and have been reverted before. Apart from my knowledge of how to use Wikipedia properly, I'm still not sure if my use has been overall constructive. Leo-Roy! ^review/gb 01:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

I've archived this review. Please see the reason listed above. If you wish to be reviewed, please file a new request and remember to transclude it onto the main Editor review page. Netalarmtalk 06:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
If I'm allowed to note of overall contributions to an article instead of just one, my contributions to
Google Earth Outreach
, both related to Google Earth, although both are presently small. I am recently involved with geocoordinates, which I am contributing to unmarked places around New England.

On other subjects, I helped to reorganize and clean up the article I Can Has Cheezburger?, which I believe has increased general organization and readability. I have also payed extensive attention to Hairspray (2007 film), in which I have added left-out plot details, character information, grammar improvements and "easter eggs". I have also "guarded" the previously-mentioned articles from vandalism, as much of their dirty work on these articles usually goes unnoticed.
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I haven't been completely stressed with others overall, but a small conflict over the reliability of a citation on the article
Tony Hawk's Adrenaline
has happened recently. I ended up keeping the citation there so someone else could come across it and determine it's reliability as well as adding a more reliable reference from the Los Angeles Times. If a new editor makes mistakes that are understandable, I will notify them of their mistake and leave suggestions on his/her talk page on how they could make sure that they won't make that mistake in the future.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.