Wikipedia:Editor review/RandyWang 2

User:RandyWang

• Some more Wikipedia talk edits would be good ;) Computerjoe's talk 16:17, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Thinka about others. There are other people that use this, you are not the only one. So THINK TWICE before you post about deleteing something! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.68.102.236 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 29 July 2006
• Make those CVG notices that you put on the deletion pages smaller, if you can y'know.

(The Bread 04:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

• Which ones, specifically?
  chat me up/_{fix me up}) 07:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I dunno what they're called, but the ones like the one you put on

the Patriots

article's deletion page, the next comment is always obscured by it

Note: This debate has been added to the

raves/_{review me!}) 14:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

(The Bread 08:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

What's the problem? That's the standard size - all I do is subst them, just like everyone else. :S

chat me up/_{fix me up}) 08:22, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

(The Bread 03:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

• Frankly, I think you're doing great, dear Randy. It is evident you're doing great efforts to improve you participation in the project, and learning policy quickly, I've seen your name repeatedly at AfD when closing debates these days, and your positions are solid and well explained. Of course, we all have room to improve - but so far, I think you're on the right track. Once your number of edits (a must for most people) get a little higher, you'll be ready for the mop - and I plan to be there when that happens! :) Cheers! Phaedriel ♥ The Wiki Soundtrack!♪ - 05:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I like this fella, and I've often seen his comments on talk/user talk pages. You seem to have a good head on your shoulders and are polite and friendly. However, I agree with the above—maybe a few more mainspace edits—encyclopedia first, community first-and-a-halfth. We seem to have the opposite problems :) I would definitely support you in an RfA (actually, <cliché>I thought you were a sysop already</cliché>). Good luck! —
  t • c • e • ER • 06:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Good job so far (and a nice guy to boot), but more mainspace is required. Question 2 answers on RfA's will be judged based on major contributions to article space (to the extreme of 1FA) -- Samir धर्म 08:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• A nice, firendly and helpful editor —
  Review Me 12:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Very nice edit contributions and an extremely helpful and thoughtful person. Keep up the great work and I hope I have more encounters with you in the near future.
  es2221 03:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool and edit summary usage (Warning:Both tools have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off. Please consider using Flcelloguy's Tool or Interiot's Tool 2)
• My statistics, using Flcelloguy's Tool:

Statistics for: RandyWang
(Permissions: N/A)
- Total: 2541 -
Main: 1018
Talk: 243
User: 204
User talk: 376
Wikipedia: 615
Wikipedia talk: 43
Image: 21
Image talk: 3
Template: 10
Template talk: 1
Category: 5
Portal: 2
-------------------
Total edits: 2541
w/ edit summary: 2417 (95.12%*)
w/ manual edit summary: 2287 (90.0%*)
Minor edits: 807 (31.75%*)
First known edit: May 22, 2005
-------------------
* - percentages are rounded down to the nearest hundredth.
-------------------

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   I'm proud of my working clearing the backlog and expanding entries at

   Personal computer game, and those that I've created, such as Comedy debate and Point of information

   . Needless to say, writing style is something I'm very anxious to improve upon in any way that I can.

1. I dunno if this is a stupid question but, are you an admin?

   Not a stupid question. :) I'm not an admin, but intend to request adminship after my (currently-running) exams.

   chat me up/_{fix me up}) 09:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

   ]