Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Hot Soul Singles number ones of 1974/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Hot Soul Singles number ones of 1974

List of Hot Soul Singles number ones of 1974 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of Hot Soul Singles number ones of 1974/archive1

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the latest in this series for your consideration. In this particular year, behold! The coming of disco :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MyCatIsAChonk

• Isn't the article in The Three Degrees capitalized?
  • No, per
    MOS:THEBAND -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Ref 6 is an AllMusic biography, which is questionable (see
  WP:ALLMUSIC
  ); got a better source?
  • Changed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I got, very nice work. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 17:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 01:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14

• For the table header, add {{abbr|Ref.|Reference}}
  • Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• tie with Roberta Flack for 1974's highest number of weeks atop the chart. -- if I'm not mistaken this is the time spent in atop the charts, perhaps it should be longest?
  • Think it's correct as it is -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• That's all from me. Another solid work. Pseud 14 (talk) 18:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 11:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

• Image review – Passed. All photos have appropriate free licensing and alt text.
• Source review – Passed. Sources are solid and formatting is good.
• Accessibility review – Passed. Columns and rows have appropriately defined scopes and meet
  MOS:DTAB
  .

Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This
  WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]