Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Local Nature Reserves in Essex/archive1

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Local Nature Reserves in Essex

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views
)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This list is in the same format as other featured lists of Local Nature Reserves, such as

Buckinghamshire, and I hope it will also be found to meet the criteria. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Not sure why Essex is emboldened at the start of the lead.
  • Convert the area into sq km or hectares or something appropriately metric.
  • Isn't Southend on Sea hyphenated?
  • "0.5 hectares" metric this time? Suggest consistent Imperial (metric) or the other way round.
  • " 75% of these are hornbeam..." shouldn't start sentences with numbers...
  • "The 8.5 long " missing a unit (and a conversion).
  • Any good reason that Pale Flax is capitalised thus?

That's about it this time round. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. I'll cap and support in due course, just interested to see what other reviewers have to say... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support lavishly illustrated, well-cited, all problems identified above fixed LavaBaron (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Why are we converting kilometer to miles? The subject is not American nor is this encyclopedia.
    Brits use miles. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am not sure if you need the initials under Keys to be bold.
  • They are in bold in other similar lists and I think it is better to be consistent.
  • The beginning of the description of the sites are quite repetitive. Most of them either begin with "This (site)" or "The (site)". I would rearrange.
  • I have amended to give more variety to the beginnings. Does it look OK now FrB.TG? Dudley Miles (talk) 15:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's certainly better now.
  • Why are the YES (under public access) in capital?
  • I think you might need to wiki-link the publishers in references (or not). It is up to you.
  • I have never (or very rarely) wiki-linked publishers and I do not think it is usual. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is it. – FrB.TG (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC) PS if it is not too much to ask, could you perhaps consider posting at FLC for listings of Bradley Cooper's films?[reply]

Support FrB.TG (talk) 15:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed- not linking publishers is unusual, but is not against any rules as long as you're consistent. Promoting. --PresN 17:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_Local_Nature_Reserves_in_Essex/archive1&oldid=753749856"