Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of accolades received by Avatar (2009 film)/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was kept by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by Avatar (2009 film)

• Featured list removal candidates/List of accolades received by Avatar (2009 film)/archive1

Notified: DrNegative, WikiProject Film

I am nominating this for featured list removal because of a number of issues. The main table needs to be reformatted to fit current standards. There are numerous dead links per [[2]], some non notable awards such Phoenix Film Critics Society, Oklahoma, and Las Vegas are included. Uses some non reliable references such Alt Film Guide, Get the Big Picture and The Daily Mail, the references are also not formatted correctly e.g. Ref 68. No Alt text for main image. Cowlibob (talk) 11:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try and save this one. The current issues with this list don't seem to be too bad, and could probably be fixed in a day or so. I haven't looked at the prose yet, but I'll get around to the list later today. Famous Hobo (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, the table has been reformatted to meet current standards. I also added an alt text, filled in some missing references, and have started working on the deadlinks. I'll also been finding replacements for non reliable sources soon. Famous Hobo (talk) 23:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Famous Hobo: Good work so far, let me know when you're finished. Cowlibob (talk) 16:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep the dead links aren't a killer for me, I'm sure that impacts just about every FL, archive.org could be helpful I suppose. The other issues aren't all that, and the work by Famous Hobo is proving excellent. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  FWIW, I've fixed the dead links and purged the list of Daily Mail nonsense. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, all of the dead links have been replaced or archived (additionally all of the redirect links have been replaced), the main table has been reformatted, non-notable awards have been removed, non-reliable references have been replaced, and an alt text has been added to the picture. I've also added two short sentences giving a plot overview of the film to the lead, since it just went straight to talking about the film's box office records. The only thing left to do is fix the formatting on some of the refs, and we should be done. Famous Hobo (talk) 22:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: This page only really needed a minor face lift and checkup, which I believe has been cleared, since Famous Hobo was Johnny-on-the-spot. I don't think this FLR is necessary at this point.
  talk•cont 23:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: - User talk:Famous Hobo has saved the day! Mattximus (talk) 02:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw Good job, Famous Hobo. The rest of the improvements can be done out of the FLRC process. Cowlibob (talk) 11:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Closing note: This
  WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]