Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 November 16

< November 15	November 17 >

November 16

File:ALMA REDLINGER in 2007.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright status is unclear, because the author is unknown but the specified license is {{self|cc-zero}}, which says "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it [...]". The source page http://patzeltart.ro/v/REDLINGER+ALMA/dar/ALMA+REDLINGER+in+12_04_2007.JPG.html does not specify any license, while the main page of http://patzeltart.ro says "All pictures are under copyright. Reproductions are for private uses only.". The file ro:File:ALMA REDLINGER in 2007.JPG (which is also specified as a source) was uploaded on April 30, 2011 as a fair-use file and it was recently deleted because the person is alive. Razvan Socol (talk) 06:26, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:StrippedFilm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused promotional photo for a completely non-notable film. The only article it could have been used for Matt Kohler, was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Kohler just deleted] for the third time for total lack of notability. Images deleted from Commons for the same reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Matt Kohler3.jpg/Commons:Deletion requests/File:MattKohler3.jpg.GrapedApe (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MattKohler.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F11 by Nthep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Unused promotional photo for a completely non-notable actor. The only article it could have been used for Matt Kohler, was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Kohler just deleted for the third time for total lack of notability. Images deleted from Commons for the same reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Matt Kohler3.jpg/Commons:Deletion requests/File:MattKohler3.jpg.GrapedApe (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MattKohler2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F11 by Nthep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Unused promotional photo for a completely non-notable actor. The only article it could have been used for Matt Kohler, was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Kohler just deleted for the third time for total lack of notability. Images deleted from Commons for the same reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Matt Kohler3.jpg/Commons:Deletion requests/File:MattKohler3.jpg.GrapedApe (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mark MacInnis Kelly Baugher Charles Agapiou with models at Camilo Pardo Solo Exhibition to benefit the Carroll Shelby Foundation.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F9 by JodyB (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Poorly composed, poor quality picture, stated to represent certain people, people whose identity is in doubt because of the low grade, badly lit picture. If the topic is notable, something that I doubt, then it can and should be replaced with a better picture. This is one for Flickr, not for Wikipedia Fiddle Faddle 15:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated it for speedy deletion as a copyright violation (CSD F9), before seeing this nomination, since I found it on a web site, marked "©AMERICAJR.com". Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 15:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reese, Derek.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image was removed from

ЛееСуда. 15:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

keep - no longer fails. changed rights. 16:11, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

You have changed nothing since I nominated the files. --

ЛееСуда. 01:55, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ellison, James.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image was removed from

ЛееСуда. 15:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

keep - no longer fails. changed rights. Jonesy702 (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have changed nothing since I nominated the files. --

ЛееСуда. 01:55, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.